How to Lower Your Real Estate Taxes

We want to decrease any costs we can. One of the costs we want to considerably decrease is our property or home taxation. Just imagine the relief we will have if a huge percentage of property taxation is slashed off. Fortunately, this is possible. But how are we going to decrease our property or home taxes? Are their tricks to help us? Below are some tips of how you can:

Study the home or home tax card:

You can ask for a copy of the home or home tax card from your municipality agency. The said card details history and details about the home. It is indicated there the size, the age and the changes made to the home. The number of rooms, bathrooms and upgrades in the home will also be included. Examine [Read more...]

Managing our Finances Whatever our Means

Despite our best efforts, few of us can expect to live without having to worry about making ends meet. The accumulated obstacles that women confront in working for financial self-reliance take their toll even among those who plan thoroughly and save diligently. Learning to cope with a lowered or inadequate income requires a creative outlook and a flexibility we may not have realized we possessed. Making a budget is one of the most important tools in knowing where money is going and altering or cutting expenses. Here is one budget strategy. First list monthly costs for survival expenses: food, rent or mortgage payments, utilities, taxes, loan repayments, transportation to work. Next, list flexible expenses: savings, clothes, entertainment, travel, and gifts. Flexible [Read more...]

Flexible Benefit Plans in US

Flexible benefit plans can provide a variety of benefits, one of which can be an effective cost containment tool.
Cafeteria Plans
The term cafeteria plan refers to an employee benefit plan in which choices can be made among several different types of benefits. Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code provides favorable tax treatment to a cafeteria plan under which all participants are employees who may choose among two or more benefits consisting of cash and qualified benefits. Qualified benefits include most welfare benefits ordinarily resulting in no taxable income to employees if provided outside of a cafeteria plan. Employees have taxable income only to the extent that they elect normally taxable benefits cash and employer-paid group term life insurance in excess of $50,000. In general, a cafeteria plan cannot include retirement benefits except for a 401(k) plan. Some benefits cannot be provided under a cafeteria plan, for example, scholarships and fellowships, transportation benefits, educational assistance, no-additional-cost services, and employee discounts.
A common type of cafeteria plan is one that offers a basic core of benefits to all employees, plus a second layer of optional benefits that permits an employee to choose benefits beyond those of the basic package. These optional benefits can be purchased with additional contributions or dollar/credits given to the employee as part of the benefit package. Another cafeteria plan is one in which an employee has a choice among a limited number of predesigned benefit packages. The predesigned packages may have significant differences or they may be virtually identical, with the major difference being in the option selected for the medical expense coverage. For example, the plan may offer two traditional insured plans, two HMOs, and a PPO. The increased choices provided covered employees naturally lead to some adverse selection. As a result, more and more employers are integrating flexible benefits and managed care to maximize employee incentives to elect and use cost-effective managed care programs.
Flexible Spending Accounts
In addition to normal cafeteria plans, Section 125 also allows employees to purchase certain benefits on a before-tax basis through the use of a flexible spending account. A flexible spending account (FSA) allows an employee to fund certain benefits on a before-tax basis by electing to take a salary reduction, which can then be used to fund the cost of any qualified benefits included in the plan. FSAs are used for medical and dental expenses not covered by the employer’s plan and for dependent care expenses. FSAs can be used by themselves or incorporated into a more comprehensive cafeteria plan. The cafeteria plans of most large employers are designed with an FSA as an integral part of the plan. The amount of the salary reduction must be determined prior to the beginning of the plan year. If the monies in the FSA are not used during the plan year, they are forfeited and belong to the employer. The growing interest in cafeteria plans on the part of employers can be traced generally to a belief that (1) employees better perceive the value, nature, and relative costs of the benefits being provided; (2) a flexible benefit structure meets the varying and changing needs of individual employees; (3) because cafeteria plans may involve a limiting of employer contributions, this approach provides opportunities to control escalating benefit levels and costs; and (4) it is an effective way to direct employees into managed care with limited access to providers.
Medical Savings Accounts
A medical savings account
is a tax-exempt, custodial account established for the purpose of paying medical expenses in conjunction with a high-deductible ($1,500 to $2,250 for single individuals and from $3,000 to $4,500 for families) major medical policy. The account is a savings account into which the insured (or an employer) can deposit money to be used for medical expenses not covered by insurance such as deductibles, eye glasses, or routine office visits. In contrast to FSAs, funds not used are allowed to accumulate and grow to help offset future expenses. Any funds not spent from the MSA eventually revert to the insured. This provides an incentive for the insured to spend carefully because the MSA funds are, in effect, his or her own money.
MSAs may be established by self-employed individuals or any employees of businesses with 50 or fewer employees who are covered under an employer-sponsored high-deductible health insurance plan. This program, established by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), is a four-year “pilot” program ending on December 31,2000, at which time Congress will evaluate the success of the program. Some believe that MSAs may make sense when used with traditional indemnity plans but not with managed care plans. An argument against MSAs is that employees will focus on receiving cash at the end of the year by minimizing treatment for minor medical expenses and preventative care. This could lead to major expenses that could have been avoided or minimized with earlier treatment. Proponents argue that any technique that lowers costs for employers will encourage some small employers to provide coverage that would have previously been unaffordable. The most significant unresolved issue regarding MSAs is the challenge of incorporating them into a managed care environment.

US Post Retirement Welfare Costs

After a long study, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS 106. This standard effectively ended the pay-as-you-go accounting for non-pension benefits retirees. This rule does not change the actual cost of providing welfare benefits for retirees. At the same time, it has had a significant adverse effect on earnings for many companies. Employers must calculate the cost of providing coverage to all active and retired employees as a current lump-sum value and begin expensive a designated portion of that amount over employees’ working years. Although the financial impact varies from company to company (depending on factors such as employee demographics and benefit plan provisions), many employers have seen as much as a tenfold increase in current accounting expense for medical benefits. This change in accounting treatment has forced employers to recognize that retiree medical coverage is an expensive benefit.

FAS 106 rules have resulted in two major changes by employers. First, many employers have lowered or eliminated retiree health care benefits or are considering such a change. Due to legal uncertainty as to the ability to eliminate or reduce benefits that have been promised to retirees, most employers are making changes in benefits available to future retirees only. Second, employers have increasingly explored methods to prefund retiree medical benefits. The change in accounting treatment does not directly affect funding decisions. There is, as yet, no legal requirement or fully tax-qualified vehicle available to prefund retiree welfare plans. Employers have generally chosen to maintain pay-as-you-go financing while moving ahead to accrual-based accounting. Assuming the employer wishes to consider advance funding, a number of vehicles are available. In selecting one of them, employers must consider three key questions:
• Can employers take a tax deduction on contributions to the plan?
• Does the income from plan investments accumulate tax free?
• Are plan participants taxed on their benefits when received?

Using these criteria, none of the available funding vehicles meets all of an employer’s needs. The available funding vehicles include (1) 501(c)(9) Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (VEBA) (a trust established to provide sickness and accident benefits to employees); (2) 401(k) Pension Plan Trust (a special account established within a company’s defined benefit pension plan to pay for medical and life insurance benefits); and (3) corporate-owned life insurance. Although all three may be tax effective to an extent under current law, recent tax rule changes have significantly limited their attractiveness. HIPAA placed new, significant restrictions on the deductibility of interest paid with respect to loans against corporate-owned, leveraged life insurance (COLI) policies.

A leveraged COLI program, usually adopted by a large public corporation, involves the purchase of life insurance on the lives of a large number of employees (e.g., all employees over 55) as a corporate investment or as a means to finance indirectly the employer’s obligation to provide post-employment life or health insurance benefits. The arrangement represents a major expansion of the concept of key person life insurance. Although effectively eliminating the ability to deduct policy loan interest under leveraged programs, key person life insurance policies and life insurance policies used to fund the buy-and-sell agreements of smaller businesses are largely unaffected by the changes.

Life Insurance Policy is an excellent type of Property to Gift

A life insurance policy often is an excellent type of property to gift. The value of the gift is the replacement cost. Were the policy included in the estate at the time of death, the estate tax value would be the amount of the death proceeds. If the face amount of the policy were $100,000 and the value for gift purposes were no more than $10,000, the policy could be transferred by gift within the annual exclusion, and there would be no gift tax consequences. Of course, the donor must live for more than three years from the date of the gift to avoid inclusion of the policy proceeds in his or her estate under IRC Section 2035.

Greatly appreciated property may make an appropriate gift. If sale of the property is anticipated, a gift to a person who is in a lower income tax bracket can make good financial sense. The donee would then sell the property and pay less tax on the gain. The gift tax consequences should be compared with the income (or capital gains) tax consequences to determine whether taxes in the overall transactions are lessened. If the property will be sold after death, it often should be retained rather than given away. This is because appreciated property receives a stepped-up tax basis if included in the estate, whereas property that is given away carries over the donor’s tax basis. If property is given away and the donee sells it, income tax must be paid on any difference between the amount received on sale and the donor’s tax basis. If the property is retained and its value included in the estate, an estate tax must be paid on the fair market value of the property. The value of the property included in the gross estate, however, becomes the new basis to be used by the beneficiaries or the estate for income or capital gains tax purposes.

Thus, suppose Larry owns only one piece of property. He paid $10,000 for it, and it is now worth $200,000. If he gives the property away and the donee sells it, the donee must pay income or capital gains tax on the $190,000 gain. If he does not give away the property but retains it until his death, naming the person to whom he would have given it during lifetime as the beneficiary, the value of the property ($200,000) will be included in his estate for estate tax purposes. The $200,000 value becomes the new tax basis for the beneficiary. If the property is then sold for its $200,000 fair market value, there is no gain, and no income or capital gains tax has to be paid by the beneficiary. As can be seen, it might be better for tax purposes to keep property rather than to give it away. One should determine in each case which approach renders the least taxes. The additional costs associated with probate should not be overlooked. These costs might offset any tax savings. There are other potential disadvantages to making taxable gifts in excess of the equivalent exemption amount. One disadvantage, of course, is the loss of control. Moreover, the transfer tax is paid earlier than would otherwise be the case if the assets were held until death.